HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3.00 GHz – Cortex-X1 (Kryo 680 Prime) 3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A78 (Kryo 680 Gold) 4x 1.80 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 680 Silver) |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | 10300 million |
TDP | 6 Watt | 8 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 780 |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 660 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 900 MHz |
Execution units | 24 | 2 |
Shaders | 384 | 512 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160@60Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 64MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 7.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 3 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | SM8350-AC | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
2
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Unisoc SC9832E
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 vs Apple A16 Bionic
5
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
6
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Unisoc SC7731E
9
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
10
Google Tensor G5 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7350