HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 (Kryo 670 Prime) 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 (Kryo 670 Gold) 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 670 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 770 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 642L |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | |
| Execution units | 24 | 4 |
| Shaders | 384 | 384 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2520x1080@144Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 1x 36MP + 1x 22MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 3.7 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 1.6 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2021 Quarter 2 |
| Partnumber | SM7325 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs MediaTek Helio G80
2
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
3
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
4
HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 9610
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
8
MediaTek Helio G200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
9
Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9825
10
Apple A9 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630