HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 (Kryo 670 Prime) 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 (Kryo 670 Gold) 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 670 Silver) |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 770 |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 642L |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Adreno 600 |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | |
Execution units | 24 | 4 |
Shaders | 384 | 384 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2520x1080@144Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 1x 36MP + 1x 22MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 3.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 1.6 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2021 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | SM7325 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Samsung Exynos 9810
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
4
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
5
Apple A12 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
6
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
7
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Apple A11 Bionic
8
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080