HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 765. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 475 Prime) 1x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 475 Gold) 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 696 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 620 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 3 |
| Shaders | 384 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 3.7 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 1.6 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2019 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | SM7250-AA | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Unisoc Tiger T620
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
4
Google Tensor G2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 vs MediaTek Helio G36
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
7
Apple M5 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
9
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
10
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5