HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 695. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 (Kryo 660 Gold) 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 4 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 686 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 2 |
| Shaders | 384 | 128 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2520x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 2.5 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2021 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | SM6375 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Apple M2 (iPad)
2
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
4
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs MediaTek Helio G70
5
Apple A15 Bionic vs Google Tensor G1
6
MediaTek Helio G91 vs Apple A10X Fusion
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
8
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs MediaTek Helio G88
9
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
10
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G