HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 680. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 (Kryo 265 Gold) 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53 (Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 686 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 2 |
| Shaders | 384 | 128 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2520x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | HD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.39 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2021 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | SM6225 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
2
Unisoc Tiger T615 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
6
Apple A10X Fusion vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
9
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Apple A16 Bionic
10
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Samsung Exynos 7420