HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 678. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 460 Gold) 6x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 11 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 685 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 612 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 2 |
| Shaders | 384 | 96 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2520x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2020 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | SM6150-AC | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
2
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs MediaTek Helio G35
3
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
4
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Samsung Exynos 850
5
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
7
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
8
Apple M5 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
9
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Samsung Exynos 9610
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F