HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 678. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 460 Gold) 6x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 11 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 685 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 612 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 2 |
| Shaders | 384 | 96 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2520x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2020 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | SM6150-AC | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A14 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 2400
2
MediaTek Helio G200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801
5
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Unisoc SC7731E
6
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
8
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 2
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4
10
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Samsung Exynos 7880