HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 662. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A73 (Kryo 260 Gold) 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 (Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 11 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 4 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 683 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 2 |
| Shaders | 384 | 128 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2520x1080@60Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.39 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2020 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | SM6115 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
5
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
6
Apple A10X Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
7
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 vs MediaTek Helio A22
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Samsung Exynos 2400
9
MediaTek Helio G96 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
10
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs MediaTek Helio P22