HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

VS

Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 632. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture	1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55	4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A73 (Kryo 250 Gold) 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 (Kryo 250 Silver)
Number of cores	8	8
Instruction Set	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A
Lithography	5 nm	14 nm
Number of transistors	15300 million	2000 million
TDP	6 Watt	5 Watt
Neural Processing	Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0	Qualcomm Hexagon 546

Memory (RAM)

Max amount	up to 16 GB	up to 8 GB
Memory type	LPDDR5	LPDDR3
Memory frequency	2750 MHz	933 MHz
Memory-bus	4x16 bit	2x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification

UFS 3.1

eMMC 5.1

Graphics

GPU name	Mali-G78 MP24	Adreno 506
GPU Architecture	Valhall	Adreno 500
GPU frequency	760 MHz	650 MHz
Execution units	24	1
Shaders	384	96
DirectX	12	12
OpenCL API	2.1	2.0
OpenGL API	ES 3.2	ES 3.1
Vulkan API	1.2	1.0

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution	3840x2160	1920x1200
Max camera resolution		1x 40MP, 2x 13MP
Max Video Capture	4K@60fps	4K@30fps
Video codec support	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9

Wireless

4G network	Yes	Yes
5G network	Yes	Yes
Peak Download Speed	4.6 Gbps	0.3 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed	2.5 Gbps	0.15 Gbps
Wi-Fi	6 (802.11ax)	4 (802.11n)
Bluetooth	5.2	5.0
Satellite navigation	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS SBAS