HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 439. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.45 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | 5500 million |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 536 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 5 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 1x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Adreno 505 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 500 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 1 |
| Shaders | 384 | 48 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1200 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 21MP, 2x 8MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | FullHD+@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.08 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2018 Quarter 2 |
| Partnumber | SDM439 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
2
Apple A10 Fusion vs MediaTek Dimensity 6400
3
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500
4
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
5
Apple M4 (iPad) vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
6
MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
7
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Apple A16 Bionic
8
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
9
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Google Tensor G4
10
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Unisoc SC9832E