HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 900 are two powerful processors with impressive specifications. Let's compare them based on their specifications to see how they stack up against each other.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G boasts an architecture of 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 features an architecture of 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 and 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55. Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
Moving on to the lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G has a smaller lithography of 5 nm compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 900's 6 nm. A smaller lithography generally results in better power efficiency and performance.
When it comes to the number of transistors, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G takes the lead with 15300 million transistors, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has 10000 million transistors. This indicates that the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G may have a slight advantage in terms of processing power and efficiency.
In terms of thermal design power (TDP), the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G consumes less power at 6 Watts, compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 900's 10 Watts. This means that the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G may offer better battery life and less heat generation.
Lastly, both processors feature neural processing units (NPUs) for AI tasks. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G incorporates the Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x) with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has its own NPU. Further details about their AI capabilities are not provided in the specifications.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G appears to have a slight advantage over the MediaTek Dimensity 900 in terms of architecture, lithography, number of transistors, TDP, and neural processing. However, it is important to note that real-world performance can vary based on several factors, including software optimization and overall device design.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G boasts an architecture of 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77, 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77, and 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 features an architecture of 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 and 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55. Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
Moving on to the lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G has a smaller lithography of 5 nm compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 900's 6 nm. A smaller lithography generally results in better power efficiency and performance.
When it comes to the number of transistors, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G takes the lead with 15300 million transistors, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has 10000 million transistors. This indicates that the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G may have a slight advantage in terms of processing power and efficiency.
In terms of thermal design power (TDP), the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G consumes less power at 6 Watts, compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 900's 10 Watts. This means that the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G may offer better battery life and less heat generation.
Lastly, both processors feature neural processing units (NPUs) for AI tasks. The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G incorporates the Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x) with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has its own NPU. Further details about their AI capabilities are not provided in the specifications.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G appears to have a slight advantage over the MediaTek Dimensity 900 in terms of architecture, lithography, number of transistors, TDP, and neural processing. However, it is important to note that real-world performance can vary based on several factors, including software optimization and overall device design.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 5 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 15300 million | 10000 million |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 900 MHz |
Execution units | 24 | 4 |
Shaders | 384 | 64 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 October | 2021 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | MT6877 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
3
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
4
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
6
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
7
Samsung Exynos 990 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
10
Apple A10 Fusion vs MediaTek Helio G25