HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
When comparing the specifications of the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and the MediaTek Dimensity 800U processors, several notable differences become apparent.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G consists of a more diverse arrangement. It features 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U incorporates 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both processors have 8 cores, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G offers a wider range of clock speeds for increased performance potential.
In terms of instruction set, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A architecture, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications.
Moving on to the lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G boasts a more advanced 5 nm process compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800U's 7 nm process. The smaller the lithography, the more efficient the processor tends to be, resulting in improved power consumption and potentially better overall performance.
When considering neural processing capabilities, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G incorporates a combination of Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x) neural processing units. This setup, along with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, enables enhanced AI performance. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U incorporates an NPU (neural processing unit) for efficient AI processing.
Furthermore, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G boasts a higher transistor count of 15300 million compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800U, potentially indicating more advanced technological capabilities.
It is important to note that these specifications provide a general overview of the differences between the two processors and do not encompass the complete range of features and performance aspects. Considerations such as GPU performance, connectivity options, and power efficiency also play a significant role in determining the overall performance and user experience of a processor. Thus, buyers should thoroughly assess their specific needs and preferences when choosing between the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 800U processors.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G consists of a more diverse arrangement. It features 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U incorporates 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both processors have 8 cores, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G offers a wider range of clock speeds for increased performance potential.
In terms of instruction set, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A architecture, ensuring compatibility with modern software and applications.
Moving on to the lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G boasts a more advanced 5 nm process compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800U's 7 nm process. The smaller the lithography, the more efficient the processor tends to be, resulting in improved power consumption and potentially better overall performance.
When considering neural processing capabilities, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G incorporates a combination of Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x) neural processing units. This setup, along with HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, enables enhanced AI performance. In contrast, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U incorporates an NPU (neural processing unit) for efficient AI processing.
Furthermore, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G boasts a higher transistor count of 15300 million compared to the MediaTek Dimensity 800U, potentially indicating more advanced technological capabilities.
It is important to note that these specifications provide a general overview of the differences between the two processors and do not encompass the complete range of features and performance aspects. Considerations such as GPU performance, connectivity options, and power efficiency also play a significant role in determining the overall performance and user experience of a processor. Thus, buyers should thoroughly assess their specific needs and preferences when choosing between the HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 800U processors.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G57 MP3 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 24 | 3 |
| Shaders | 384 | 48 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30FPS |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2020 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Helio G85
2
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Unisoc Tiger T615
3
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
5
Samsung Exynos 2600 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs MediaTek Helio P65
7
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Unisoc Tiger T606
8
Google Tensor G3 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
9
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
10
MediaTek Helio G80 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G