HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The HiSilicon Kirin 710F and Unisoc Tiger T710 are both processors designed for mobile devices, but they have distinct differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores allows for a balanced and optimized performance. The Kirin 710F operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and is built using the 12 nm lithography process. With 5500 million transistors, it offers a good level of processing power. Additionally, the TDP (thermal design power) is 5 Watts, which means it is well-suited for mobile devices with lower power consumption requirements.
Moving on to the Unisoc Tiger T710, it also features an 8-core CPU architecture. However, it differs in terms of the cores. It has 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination provides a balance between performance and power efficiency, similar to the Kirin 710F. The Tiger T710 operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is also built using the 12 nm lithography process. One notable advantage of the Tiger T710 is its inclusion of a dual neural processing unit (NPU). This allows for advanced AI capabilities and enhanced performance in tasks related to machine learning and artificial intelligence.
In summary, both the HiSilicon Kirin 710F and Unisoc Tiger T710 offer 8-core architectures with a mix of high-performance and power-efficient cores. They differ in terms of the specific cores they use, with the Kirin 710F featuring Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores, and the Tiger T710 featuring Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. Additionally, the Tiger T710 boasts the advantage of including a dual NPU for advanced AI capabilities. Overall, these processors provide different options for mobile device manufacturers, allowing them to choose the best fit for their specific requirements and target market.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores allows for a balanced and optimized performance. The Kirin 710F operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and is built using the 12 nm lithography process. With 5500 million transistors, it offers a good level of processing power. Additionally, the TDP (thermal design power) is 5 Watts, which means it is well-suited for mobile devices with lower power consumption requirements.
Moving on to the Unisoc Tiger T710, it also features an 8-core CPU architecture. However, it differs in terms of the cores. It has 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This combination provides a balance between performance and power efficiency, similar to the Kirin 710F. The Tiger T710 operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is also built using the 12 nm lithography process. One notable advantage of the Tiger T710 is its inclusion of a dual neural processing unit (NPU). This allows for advanced AI capabilities and enhanced performance in tasks related to machine learning and artificial intelligence.
In summary, both the HiSilicon Kirin 710F and Unisoc Tiger T710 offer 8-core architectures with a mix of high-performance and power-efficient cores. They differ in terms of the specific cores they use, with the Kirin 710F featuring Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores, and the Tiger T710 featuring Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores. Additionally, the Tiger T710 boasts the advantage of including a dual NPU for advanced AI capabilities. Overall, these processors provide different options for mobile device manufacturers, allowing them to choose the best fit for their specific requirements and target market.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 800 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 64 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 1 | 2019 |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T710 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
3
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
4
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
6
Google Tensor G1 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
8
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
9
MediaTek Helio P70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
10
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Unisoc SC7731E