HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The HiSilicon Kirin 710F and Unisoc Tiger T618 are two processors that are often compared in terms of their specifications. Let's take a closer look at these processors side by side.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710F features a combination of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 has 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores, but they differ in the arrangement and type of cores.
The instruction set of both processors is ARMv8-A, which is considered a standard for modern processors. This ensures compatibility with a wide range of software and applications.
Regarding lithography, both processors have a 12 nm architecture. The smaller the lithography, the more power-efficient the processor tends to be, as it allows for better heat management and power consumption.
The Kirin 710F comprises approximately 5500 million transistors, whereas the Tiger T618 does not provide specific information regarding the number of transistors it houses.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the Kirin 710F has a lower TDP of 5 Watts, indicating that it operates at a lower power consumption level. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 has a TDP of 10 Watts, suggesting it may use more power compared to the Kirin 710F.
One notable difference between these processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Tiger T618. This added feature enhances the processor's ability to handle AI tasks and neural networks.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710F and Unisoc Tiger T618 differ in terms of their CPU architecture, TDP, and the presence of an NPU in the Tiger T618. While the Kirin 710F offers a higher number of transistors, the Tiger T618 may have an advantage in handling AI tasks. The choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and intended usage of the device they will be used in.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710F features a combination of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 has 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Both processors have 8 cores, but they differ in the arrangement and type of cores.
The instruction set of both processors is ARMv8-A, which is considered a standard for modern processors. This ensures compatibility with a wide range of software and applications.
Regarding lithography, both processors have a 12 nm architecture. The smaller the lithography, the more power-efficient the processor tends to be, as it allows for better heat management and power consumption.
The Kirin 710F comprises approximately 5500 million transistors, whereas the Tiger T618 does not provide specific information regarding the number of transistors it houses.
In terms of TDP (Thermal Design Power), the Kirin 710F has a lower TDP of 5 Watts, indicating that it operates at a lower power consumption level. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 has a TDP of 10 Watts, suggesting it may use more power compared to the Kirin 710F.
One notable difference between these processors is the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Tiger T618. This added feature enhances the processor's ability to handle AI tasks and neural networks.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710F and Unisoc Tiger T618 differ in terms of their CPU architecture, TDP, and the presence of an NPU in the Tiger T618. While the Kirin 710F offers a higher number of transistors, the Tiger T618 may have an advantage in handling AI tasks. The choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and intended usage of the device they will be used in.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 1 | 2019 August |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Helio G80
2
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs MediaTek Helio G95
3
Unisoc SC9863A vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
4
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
5
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Samsung Exynos 8890
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
8
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
9
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
10
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845