HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Unisoc Tiger T616
The HiSilicon Kirin 710F and Unisoc Tiger T616 are two processors commonly used in smartphones and other small devices. While they both have similar features, such as 8 cores and a lithography of 12 nm, there are several key differences between them.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it boasts an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53. This combination of cores allows for efficient multitasking and smooth performance. With its ARMv8-A instruction set and 5500 million transistors, the Kirin 710F is capable of handling complex instructions and tasks effectively. Additionally, it has a low TDP of 5 Watts, making it energy efficient and ideal for devices with limited power capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T616 features an architecture of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. While it has a higher clock speed than the Kirin 710F, it may not offer the same efficiency in multitasking and performance. With its ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a lithography of 12 nm, the Tiger T616 can still handle most tasks, but it may struggle with more demanding applications. The T616 also has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts, which means it may consume more power compared to the Kirin 710F.
In terms of overall performance, the HiSilicon Kirin 710F may have the edge with its combination of faster cores and lower power consumption. However, the Unisoc Tiger T616 could still be a viable option for users who prioritize higher clock speeds and are willing to sacrifice some efficiency.
Ultimately, choosing between these two processors will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user. Both processors have their own strengths and weaknesses, and it is important to consider factors such as intended usage, power efficiency, and overall performance when making a decision.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it boasts an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53. This combination of cores allows for efficient multitasking and smooth performance. With its ARMv8-A instruction set and 5500 million transistors, the Kirin 710F is capable of handling complex instructions and tasks effectively. Additionally, it has a low TDP of 5 Watts, making it energy efficient and ideal for devices with limited power capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T616 features an architecture of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. While it has a higher clock speed than the Kirin 710F, it may not offer the same efficiency in multitasking and performance. With its ARMv8.2-A instruction set and a lithography of 12 nm, the Tiger T616 can still handle most tasks, but it may struggle with more demanding applications. The T616 also has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts, which means it may consume more power compared to the Kirin 710F.
In terms of overall performance, the HiSilicon Kirin 710F may have the edge with its combination of faster cores and lower power consumption. However, the Unisoc Tiger T616 could still be a viable option for users who prioritize higher clock speeds and are willing to sacrifice some efficiency.
Ultimately, choosing between these two processors will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user. Both processors have their own strengths and weaknesses, and it is important to consider factors such as intended usage, power efficiency, and overall performance when making a decision.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 1 |
| Shaders | 64 | 16 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 1 | 2021 |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | T616 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A12 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 1480
2
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
3
MediaTek Helio G37 vs Apple A16 Bionic
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
6
Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Google Tensor G4
7
Apple A9 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
9
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
10
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Unisoc Tiger T612