HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The HiSilicon Kirin 710F and Unisoc Tiger T612 are both processors used in smartphones and other electronic devices. Let's compare their specifications to see how they stack up against each other.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it has a total of 8 CPU cores, consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination offers decent performance for multitasking and everyday tasks. The architecture of the Kirin 710F is based on ARMv8-A instruction set. It is built on a 12 nm lithography process, which helps in power efficiency and overall performance. The processor contains around 5500 million transistors and operates with a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, ensuring it doesn't overheat easily.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 also features 8 CPU cores, but with a different architecture. It includes 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration provides a good balance between power and efficiency. The Tiger T612 is also designed using the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and shares the same 12 nm lithography process as the Kirin 710F. However, it has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts, indicating that it may consume more power compared to the Kirin 710F.
In terms of specifications, both processors offer similar capabilities, with differences in the specific configurations of their CPU cores. The Kirin 710F may provide a bit more power with its 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores, while the Tiger T612 aims for a balance between power and efficiency with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz.
Overall, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements of the device and the user's priorities. If power performance is crucial, the Kirin 710F could be the preferred option. However, if a balance between power and efficiency is desired, the Tiger T612 might be a suitable choice.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it has a total of 8 CPU cores, consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination offers decent performance for multitasking and everyday tasks. The architecture of the Kirin 710F is based on ARMv8-A instruction set. It is built on a 12 nm lithography process, which helps in power efficiency and overall performance. The processor contains around 5500 million transistors and operates with a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, ensuring it doesn't overheat easily.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 also features 8 CPU cores, but with a different architecture. It includes 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration provides a good balance between power and efficiency. The Tiger T612 is also designed using the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and shares the same 12 nm lithography process as the Kirin 710F. However, it has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts, indicating that it may consume more power compared to the Kirin 710F.
In terms of specifications, both processors offer similar capabilities, with differences in the specific configurations of their CPU cores. The Kirin 710F may provide a bit more power with its 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores, while the Tiger T612 aims for a balance between power and efficiency with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.8 GHz.
Overall, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements of the device and the user's priorities. If power performance is crucial, the Kirin 710F could be the preferred option. However, if a balance between power and efficiency is desired, the Tiger T612 might be a suitable choice.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 1 | 2022 January |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
2
Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
3
MediaTek Helio G70 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
6
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
8
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 1280
10
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810