HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The HiSilicon Kirin 710F and the Unisoc Tiger T610 are two processors that are commonly used in mobile devices. Let's compare their specifications to see how they stack up against each other.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710F boasts a 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 architecture. On the other hand, the Tiger T610 has a 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture. Both processors have 8 cores, ensuring smooth multitasking capabilities.
When it comes to the instruction set, the Kirin 710F supports ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T610 supports ARMv8.2-A. This means that the Tiger T610 has a more updated instruction set, potentially resulting in improved performance and efficiency.
In terms of lithography, both processors are manufactured using a 12 nm process, which is considered to be quite efficient. This ensures a balance between power consumption and performance.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 710F has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, while the Tiger T610 has a TDP of 10 Watts. A lower TDP indicates that the Kirin 710F is more power-efficient.
Additionally, the Kirin 710F has a slightly higher number of transistors with 5500 million, whereas the Tiger T610 does not disclose this specification.
Overall, both the HiSilicon Kirin 710F and the Unisoc Tiger T610 are capable processors, but they differ in terms of architecture, instruction set, and power consumption. The Tiger T610 has a more updated instruction set, which may result in better performance. However, the Kirin 710F has a lower TDP, making it more power-efficient. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710F boasts a 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 architecture. On the other hand, the Tiger T610 has a 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture. Both processors have 8 cores, ensuring smooth multitasking capabilities.
When it comes to the instruction set, the Kirin 710F supports ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T610 supports ARMv8.2-A. This means that the Tiger T610 has a more updated instruction set, potentially resulting in improved performance and efficiency.
In terms of lithography, both processors are manufactured using a 12 nm process, which is considered to be quite efficient. This ensures a balance between power consumption and performance.
In terms of power consumption, the Kirin 710F has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, while the Tiger T610 has a TDP of 10 Watts. A lower TDP indicates that the Kirin 710F is more power-efficient.
Additionally, the Kirin 710F has a slightly higher number of transistors with 5500 million, whereas the Tiger T610 does not disclose this specification.
Overall, both the HiSilicon Kirin 710F and the Unisoc Tiger T610 are capable processors, but they differ in terms of architecture, instruction set, and power consumption. The Tiger T610 has a more updated instruction set, which may result in better performance. However, the Kirin 710F has a lower TDP, making it more power-efficient. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 1 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
3
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
4
MediaTek Helio P65 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
5
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
6
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
7
Apple A11 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900