HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The HiSilicon Kirin 710F and the Unisoc Tiger T310 are two processors with different specifications. Let's compare them based on their key features.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 710F features 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both processors offer multi-core configurations, the Kirin 710F has more cores, totaling 8 compared to the T310's 4 cores. This difference could have an impact on performance, especially in multitasking scenarios.
In terms of the instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8 architecture, but the Kirin 710F is based on the older ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T310 is based on the newer ARMv8.2-A. This means that the T310 could potentially benefit from improved instruction sets and optimizations.
Additionally, both processors share the same 12 nm lithography process, which refers to the size of the transistors on the chip. However, the number of transistors is only specified for the Kirin 710F at 5500 million, while it is not mentioned for the Tiger T310.
Another notable difference is the TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating. The HiSilicon Kirin 710F has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the T310's TDP is not provided. Generally, a lower TDP indicates better power efficiency, which can lead to longer battery life in devices that incorporate these processors.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 710F stands out with its higher core count and defined TDP rating. However, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has the advantage of being based on a newer ARM architecture. Depending on specific use cases and requirements, one processor may be more suitable than the other. It is recommended to consider factors such as performance needs, power efficiency, and device compatibility when making a choice between these processors.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 710F features 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While both processors offer multi-core configurations, the Kirin 710F has more cores, totaling 8 compared to the T310's 4 cores. This difference could have an impact on performance, especially in multitasking scenarios.
In terms of the instruction set, both processors support the ARMv8 architecture, but the Kirin 710F is based on the older ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T310 is based on the newer ARMv8.2-A. This means that the T310 could potentially benefit from improved instruction sets and optimizations.
Additionally, both processors share the same 12 nm lithography process, which refers to the size of the transistors on the chip. However, the number of transistors is only specified for the Kirin 710F at 5500 million, while it is not mentioned for the Tiger T310.
Another notable difference is the TDP (Thermal Design Power) rating. The HiSilicon Kirin 710F has a TDP of 5 Watts, while the T310's TDP is not provided. Generally, a lower TDP indicates better power efficiency, which can lead to longer battery life in devices that incorporate these processors.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 710F stands out with its higher core count and defined TDP rating. However, the Unisoc Tiger T310 has the advantage of being based on a newer ARM architecture. Depending on specific use cases and requirements, one processor may be more suitable than the other. It is recommended to consider factors such as performance needs, power efficiency, and device compatibility when making a choice between these processors.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1333 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 2 |
| Shaders | 64 | 32 |
| DirectX | 12 | 10 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 1 | 2019 April |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | T310 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs MediaTek Helio P35
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
3
MediaTek Dimensity 7400 vs Google Tensor G1
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Samsung Exynos 990
5
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs MediaTek Helio G95
6
Apple A19 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
8
Samsung Exynos 1480 vs Apple A13 Bionic
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
10
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs MediaTek Helio P70