HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Unisoc SC7731E
The HiSilicon Kirin 710F and Unisoc SC7731E are two processors that cater to different needs. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it is built on a 12nm lithography process, making it more power-efficient and capable of delivering better performance. It features an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor provides the user with sufficient power for multitasking and running demanding applications. The ARMv8-A instruction set ensures compatibility with the latest software. Additionally, it houses 5500 million transistors, indicating a higher level of integration and potential for faster task execution. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Kirin 710F is 5 watts, indicating moderate power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E is built on a larger 28nm lithography process, making it less energy-efficient compared to the Kirin 710F. It features an architecture of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores. With only 4 cores, this processor may struggle to deliver smooth performance while executing demanding tasks. The ARMv7-A instruction set limits compatibility with some modern software. The TDP of the SC7731E is slightly higher at 7 watts, indicating relatively higher power consumption.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710F outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of both architecture and lithography. The Kirin 710F's 8-core configuration and its usage of the ARMv8-A instruction set make it a more capable and efficient processor. Moreover, the smaller lithography process allows the Kirin 710F to deliver better performance while consuming less power. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E's lower core count, larger lithography, and older instruction set make it suitable for basic smartphone applications but may struggle with demanding tasks.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it is built on a 12nm lithography process, making it more power-efficient and capable of delivering better performance. It features an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor provides the user with sufficient power for multitasking and running demanding applications. The ARMv8-A instruction set ensures compatibility with the latest software. Additionally, it houses 5500 million transistors, indicating a higher level of integration and potential for faster task execution. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Kirin 710F is 5 watts, indicating moderate power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E is built on a larger 28nm lithography process, making it less energy-efficient compared to the Kirin 710F. It features an architecture of 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores. With only 4 cores, this processor may struggle to deliver smooth performance while executing demanding tasks. The ARMv7-A instruction set limits compatibility with some modern software. The TDP of the SC7731E is slightly higher at 7 watts, indicating relatively higher power consumption.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710F outperforms the Unisoc SC7731E in terms of both architecture and lithography. The Kirin 710F's 8-core configuration and its usage of the ARMv8-A instruction set make it a more capable and efficient processor. Moreover, the smaller lithography process allows the Kirin 710F to deliver better performance while consuming less power. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E's lower core count, larger lithography, and older instruction set make it suitable for basic smartphone applications but may struggle with demanding tasks.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Midgard |
GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 600 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | HD@30fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 1 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs MediaTek Helio P90
2
MediaTek Helio G92 Max vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
3
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9020
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Unisoc SC9832E
5
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Apple A10 Fusion
6
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
7
Apple A12 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G96
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
10
Apple A13 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000