HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
The HiSilicon Kirin 710F and the MediaTek Dimensity 800U are two processors with different specifications. Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710F, it is built on a 12 nm lithography process and features a total of 8 cores. Its architecture includes 4 Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. With its ARMv8-A instruction set, this processor features a total of 5500 million transistors and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U is built on a more advanced 7 nm lithography process. Like the Kirin 710F, it also features 8 cores. However, its architecture consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. The Dimensity 800U supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The presence of an NPU enhances the processing power and capabilities of the processor, especially for tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning.
In terms of lithography, the Dimensity 800U has a clear advantage with its 7 nm process compared to the Kirin 710F's 12 nm process. This allows for better power efficiency and potentially higher performance due to the smaller size of the transistors. Additionally, the inclusion of the NPU in the Dimensity 800U further enhances its capabilities, particularly in tasks that require AI processing.
Both processors have their strengths and weaknesses. The Kirin 710F may offer more balanced performance with its combination of Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores, while the Dimensity 800U's more powerful Cortex-A76 cores may provide better overall performance. However, the Dimensity 800U's smaller lithography process and inclusion of an NPU may offer advantages in terms of power efficiency and AI-related tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user or the device manufacturer.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U is built on a more advanced 7 nm lithography process. Like the Kirin 710F, it also features 8 cores. However, its architecture consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. The Dimensity 800U supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The presence of an NPU enhances the processing power and capabilities of the processor, especially for tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning.
In terms of lithography, the Dimensity 800U has a clear advantage with its 7 nm process compared to the Kirin 710F's 12 nm process. This allows for better power efficiency and potentially higher performance due to the smaller size of the transistors. Additionally, the inclusion of the NPU in the Dimensity 800U further enhances its capabilities, particularly in tasks that require AI processing.
Both processors have their strengths and weaknesses. The Kirin 710F may offer more balanced performance with its combination of Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores, while the Dimensity 800U's more powerful Cortex-A76 cores may provide better overall performance. However, the Dimensity 800U's smaller lithography process and inclusion of an NPU may offer advantages in terms of power efficiency and AI-related tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user or the device manufacturer.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP3 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 3 |
Shaders | 64 | 48 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 1 | 2020 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G25 vs Apple A10X Fusion
2
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Apple A17 Pro
4
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Apple A11 Bionic
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
6
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
7
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Unisoc SC9863A
8
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930