HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Unisoc Tiger T710
VS
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the Unisoc Tiger T710 are both octa-core processors designed for smartphones. However, there are some key differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710A, it features an architecture that consists of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination offers a balanced performance for multitasking and energy efficiency. The processor's 14 nm lithography ensures better power efficiency by reducing energy leakage. With a TDP of 5 Watts, it can help prolong battery life.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 has an architecture that includes 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration aims to provide a good blend of performance and power efficiency. The 12 nm lithography of this processor further improves power efficiency and heat dissipation. The Tiger T710 also boasts a dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances AI capabilities, offering increased performance in tasks like image recognition and voice recognition.
In terms of instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A utilizes ARMv8-A, while the Unisoc Tiger T710 adopts ARMv8.2-A. This means that the latter processor supports more advanced features and technologies.
In summary, both the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the Unisoc Tiger T710 have their own strengths. The Kirin 710A excels in power efficiency with its 14 nm lithography and lower TDP. Meanwhile, the Tiger T710 stands out with its dual NPU and ARMv8.2-A instruction set, offering enhanced AI capabilities and advanced features. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the device and its users.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710A, it features an architecture that consists of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination offers a balanced performance for multitasking and energy efficiency. The processor's 14 nm lithography ensures better power efficiency by reducing energy leakage. With a TDP of 5 Watts, it can help prolong battery life.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 has an architecture that includes 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration aims to provide a good blend of performance and power efficiency. The 12 nm lithography of this processor further improves power efficiency and heat dissipation. The Tiger T710 also boasts a dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which enhances AI capabilities, offering increased performance in tasks like image recognition and voice recognition.
In terms of instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A utilizes ARMv8-A, while the Unisoc Tiger T710 adopts ARMv8.2-A. This means that the latter processor supports more advanced features and technologies.
In summary, both the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the Unisoc Tiger T710 have their own strengths. The Kirin 710A excels in power efficiency with its 14 nm lithography and lower TDP. Meanwhile, the Tiger T710 stands out with its dual NPU and ARMv8.2-A instruction set, offering enhanced AI capabilities and advanced features. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the device and its users.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 800 MHz |
| GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
| Execution units | 4 | |
| Shaders | 64 | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2019 |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | T710 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A13 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 8895
2
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
4
Google Tensor G1 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
5
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
6
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs MediaTek Helio G96
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
10
Apple A16 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020