HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc Tiger T618 are both processors used in mobile devices, but they have different specifications and capabilities.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710A has 8 cores with a combination of Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53. The 4 Cortex-A73 cores run at 2.0 GHz, while the 4 Cortex-A53 cores run at 1.7 GHz. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 also has 8 cores, but it utilizes a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55. It has 2 Cortex-A75 cores running at 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz.
When it comes to instruction set, the Kirin 710A uses ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T618 uses ARMv8.2-A. This means that the Kirin 710A supports the ARMv8-A instruction set, which is the base level for 64-bit processor support, whereas the Tiger T618 supports the updated ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 710A is manufactured using a 14nm process, while the Tiger T618 utilizes a 12nm process. A smaller lithography process generally indicates better power efficiency and potentially higher performance.
The Kirin 710A has a TDP (thermal design power) of 5 Watts, while the Tiger T618 has a TDP of 10 Watts. A lower TDP typically means better power efficiency, which can contribute to longer battery life.
An additional feature of the Tiger T618 is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is designed to accelerate tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning. This can enable devices using the Tiger T618 to perform tasks such as facial recognition and image processing more efficiently.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc Tiger T618 processors differ in terms of their CPU cores and architecture, instruction set, lithography, TDP, and additional features. Depending on the specific needs and priorities of a device, one may be preferred over the other.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710A has 8 cores with a combination of Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53. The 4 Cortex-A73 cores run at 2.0 GHz, while the 4 Cortex-A53 cores run at 1.7 GHz. On the other hand, the Tiger T618 also has 8 cores, but it utilizes a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55. It has 2 Cortex-A75 cores running at 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz.
When it comes to instruction set, the Kirin 710A uses ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T618 uses ARMv8.2-A. This means that the Kirin 710A supports the ARMv8-A instruction set, which is the base level for 64-bit processor support, whereas the Tiger T618 supports the updated ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 710A is manufactured using a 14nm process, while the Tiger T618 utilizes a 12nm process. A smaller lithography process generally indicates better power efficiency and potentially higher performance.
The Kirin 710A has a TDP (thermal design power) of 5 Watts, while the Tiger T618 has a TDP of 10 Watts. A lower TDP typically means better power efficiency, which can contribute to longer battery life.
An additional feature of the Tiger T618 is its Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is designed to accelerate tasks related to artificial intelligence and machine learning. This can enable devices using the Tiger T618 to perform tasks such as facial recognition and image processing more efficiently.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc Tiger T618 processors differ in terms of their CPU cores and architecture, instruction set, lithography, TDP, and additional features. Depending on the specific needs and priorities of a device, one may be preferred over the other.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2019 August |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Unisoc SC9863A
5
MediaTek Helio P90 vs MediaTek Helio G90
6
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
7
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Helio G85
9
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs MediaTek Helio G88
10
Apple A12 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T710