HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Unisoc Tiger T612
VS
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the Unisoc Tiger T612 are two processors that have their own unique specifications. Let's explore the differences between the two.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710A features a combination of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T612 combines 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores with 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It's worth noting that both processors have a total of 8 cores, but differ in their specific architecture.
Moving on to other specifications, the Kirin 710A operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set, while the Tiger T612 operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This indicates that the Tiger T612 may have some architectural enhancements and improvements over the Kirin 710A.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 710A utilizes a 14 nm process, while the Tiger T612 employs a more advanced 12 nm process. This suggests that the Tiger T612 may have a slight edge in power efficiency and heat management.
Furthermore, when comparing the number of transistors, the Kirin 710A boasts 5500 million, while the exact number for the Tiger T612 is not specified. However, it is safe to assume that the Tiger T612 may have a similar number of transistors or potentially more given its improved lithography.
Lastly, there is a discrepancy in the thermal design power (TDP) between the two processors. The Kirin 710A has a TDP of 5 Watts, indicating low power consumption. On the other hand, the Tiger T612 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts, implying a potentially higher power consumption.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the Unisoc Tiger T612 processors display differences in CPU cores and architecture, instruction set, lithography, and TDP. While the Tiger T612 appears to have some advancements in terms of architecture and lithography, further benchmarks and real-world performance tests would be required to determine the overall superiority of one processor over the other.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710A features a combination of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Tiger T612 combines 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores with 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It's worth noting that both processors have a total of 8 cores, but differ in their specific architecture.
Moving on to other specifications, the Kirin 710A operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set, while the Tiger T612 operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This indicates that the Tiger T612 may have some architectural enhancements and improvements over the Kirin 710A.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 710A utilizes a 14 nm process, while the Tiger T612 employs a more advanced 12 nm process. This suggests that the Tiger T612 may have a slight edge in power efficiency and heat management.
Furthermore, when comparing the number of transistors, the Kirin 710A boasts 5500 million, while the exact number for the Tiger T612 is not specified. However, it is safe to assume that the Tiger T612 may have a similar number of transistors or potentially more given its improved lithography.
Lastly, there is a discrepancy in the thermal design power (TDP) between the two processors. The Kirin 710A has a TDP of 5 Watts, indicating low power consumption. On the other hand, the Tiger T612 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts, implying a potentially higher power consumption.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the Unisoc Tiger T612 processors display differences in CPU cores and architecture, instruction set, lithography, and TDP. While the Tiger T612 appears to have some advancements in terms of architecture and lithography, further benchmarks and real-world performance tests would be required to determine the overall superiority of one processor over the other.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
| GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
| Execution units | 4 | 1 |
| Shaders | 64 | 16 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 50MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2022 January |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | T612 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 990 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Apple A12 Bionic
3
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
4
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
5
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
6
MediaTek Helio G90 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
9
MediaTek Helio P95 vs MediaTek Helio G88
10
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1