HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc Tiger T610 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them in terms of their architecture, CPU cores, and other key features.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710A, it features a architecture of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The processor has a total of 8 cores. It uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 14 nm. With 5500 million transistors, the Kirin 710A operates at a TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 boasts a different architecture, consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 710A, it also has 8 cores in total. However, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a smaller lithography of 12 nm. The Tiger T610 operates at a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.
In terms of performance, it's worth noting that the Kirin 710A has a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A73 cores compared to the Tiger T610's Cortex-A75 cores. However, the Tiger T610 has more Cortex-A55 cores, which may provide better multitasking capabilities. The smaller lithography of the Tiger T610 can also offer potential benefits in terms of power efficiency and heat dissipation.
While both processors have their own set of specifications and strengths, it's important to consider other factors such as GPU performance, AI capabilities, and overall system integration before determining their overall performance. These additional factors can significantly impact the overall user experience, making it crucial to thoroughly analyze specifications beyond just their CPU cores and architecture.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc Tiger T610 processors have distinct specifications in terms of their architecture, CPU cores, lithography, and TDP. Further analysis and testing are necessary to determine their overall performance and suitability for specific use cases.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710A, it features a architecture of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The processor has a total of 8 cores. It uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 14 nm. With 5500 million transistors, the Kirin 710A operates at a TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 boasts a different architecture, consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 710A, it also has 8 cores in total. However, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a smaller lithography of 12 nm. The Tiger T610 operates at a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.
In terms of performance, it's worth noting that the Kirin 710A has a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A73 cores compared to the Tiger T610's Cortex-A75 cores. However, the Tiger T610 has more Cortex-A55 cores, which may provide better multitasking capabilities. The smaller lithography of the Tiger T610 can also offer potential benefits in terms of power efficiency and heat dissipation.
While both processors have their own set of specifications and strengths, it's important to consider other factors such as GPU performance, AI capabilities, and overall system integration before determining their overall performance. These additional factors can significantly impact the overall user experience, making it crucial to thoroughly analyze specifications beyond just their CPU cores and architecture.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc Tiger T610 processors have distinct specifications in terms of their architecture, CPU cores, lithography, and TDP. Further analysis and testing are necessary to determine their overall performance and suitability for specific use cases.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
3
Apple A13 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G96
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
5
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
6
MediaTek Helio G70 vs MediaTek Helio G37
7
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
9
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020