HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc Tiger T610 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them in terms of their architecture, CPU cores, and other key features.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710A, it features a architecture of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The processor has a total of 8 cores. It uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 14 nm. With 5500 million transistors, the Kirin 710A operates at a TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 boasts a different architecture, consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 710A, it also has 8 cores in total. However, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a smaller lithography of 12 nm. The Tiger T610 operates at a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.
In terms of performance, it's worth noting that the Kirin 710A has a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A73 cores compared to the Tiger T610's Cortex-A75 cores. However, the Tiger T610 has more Cortex-A55 cores, which may provide better multitasking capabilities. The smaller lithography of the Tiger T610 can also offer potential benefits in terms of power efficiency and heat dissipation.
While both processors have their own set of specifications and strengths, it's important to consider other factors such as GPU performance, AI capabilities, and overall system integration before determining their overall performance. These additional factors can significantly impact the overall user experience, making it crucial to thoroughly analyze specifications beyond just their CPU cores and architecture.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc Tiger T610 processors have distinct specifications in terms of their architecture, CPU cores, lithography, and TDP. Further analysis and testing are necessary to determine their overall performance and suitability for specific use cases.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710A, it features a architecture of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The processor has a total of 8 cores. It uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 14 nm. With 5500 million transistors, the Kirin 710A operates at a TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 boasts a different architecture, consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 710A, it also has 8 cores in total. However, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a smaller lithography of 12 nm. The Tiger T610 operates at a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.
In terms of performance, it's worth noting that the Kirin 710A has a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A73 cores compared to the Tiger T610's Cortex-A75 cores. However, the Tiger T610 has more Cortex-A55 cores, which may provide better multitasking capabilities. The smaller lithography of the Tiger T610 can also offer potential benefits in terms of power efficiency and heat dissipation.
While both processors have their own set of specifications and strengths, it's important to consider other factors such as GPU performance, AI capabilities, and overall system integration before determining their overall performance. These additional factors can significantly impact the overall user experience, making it crucial to thoroughly analyze specifications beyond just their CPU cores and architecture.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc Tiger T610 processors have distinct specifications in terms of their architecture, CPU cores, lithography, and TDP. Further analysis and testing are necessary to determine their overall performance and suitability for specific use cases.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Apple A10 Fusion
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Apple A17 Pro
4
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
5
MediaTek Helio G80 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Apple A11 Bionic
7
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Google Tensor G2
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Unisoc SC9863A
9
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
10
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Samsung Exynos 990