HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc Tiger T610 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them in terms of their architecture, CPU cores, and other key features.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710A, it features a architecture of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The processor has a total of 8 cores. It uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 14 nm. With 5500 million transistors, the Kirin 710A operates at a TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 boasts a different architecture, consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 710A, it also has 8 cores in total. However, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a smaller lithography of 12 nm. The Tiger T610 operates at a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.
In terms of performance, it's worth noting that the Kirin 710A has a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A73 cores compared to the Tiger T610's Cortex-A75 cores. However, the Tiger T610 has more Cortex-A55 cores, which may provide better multitasking capabilities. The smaller lithography of the Tiger T610 can also offer potential benefits in terms of power efficiency and heat dissipation.
While both processors have their own set of specifications and strengths, it's important to consider other factors such as GPU performance, AI capabilities, and overall system integration before determining their overall performance. These additional factors can significantly impact the overall user experience, making it crucial to thoroughly analyze specifications beyond just their CPU cores and architecture.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc Tiger T610 processors have distinct specifications in terms of their architecture, CPU cores, lithography, and TDP. Further analysis and testing are necessary to determine their overall performance and suitability for specific use cases.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710A, it features a architecture of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The processor has a total of 8 cores. It uses the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 14 nm. With 5500 million transistors, the Kirin 710A operates at a TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T610 boasts a different architecture, consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 710A, it also has 8 cores in total. However, it uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a smaller lithography of 12 nm. The Tiger T610 operates at a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts.
In terms of performance, it's worth noting that the Kirin 710A has a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A73 cores compared to the Tiger T610's Cortex-A75 cores. However, the Tiger T610 has more Cortex-A55 cores, which may provide better multitasking capabilities. The smaller lithography of the Tiger T610 can also offer potential benefits in terms of power efficiency and heat dissipation.
While both processors have their own set of specifications and strengths, it's important to consider other factors such as GPU performance, AI capabilities, and overall system integration before determining their overall performance. These additional factors can significantly impact the overall user experience, making it crucial to thoroughly analyze specifications beyond just their CPU cores and architecture.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc Tiger T610 processors have distinct specifications in terms of their architecture, CPU cores, lithography, and TDP. Further analysis and testing are necessary to determine their overall performance and suitability for specific use cases.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
2
Apple A11 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
3
MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
4
MediaTek Helio P60 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
5
MediaTek Helio G90T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
7
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Apple A13 Bionic
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs Apple A10 Fusion
9
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
10
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G