HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
When comparing the specifications of the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G processors, several differences can be noted.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A features 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G consists of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It is interesting to note that the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G employs the more advanced and newer Cortex-A75 architecture.
Both processors share similar core counts, with 8 cores each. This means that both processors are capable of handling multiple tasks simultaneously, allowing for smoother multitasking experiences.
When it comes to instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A adopts the ARMv8-A instruction set, while the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G utilizes the more recent ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The inclusion of the ARMv8.2-A instruction set in the Tanggula T740 5G may contribute to improved performance and efficiency.
In terms of lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A is manufactured using a 14 nm process, whereas the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G adopts a more advanced 12 nm lithography. The smaller lithography in the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G can potentially lead to better power efficiency and thermal performance.
Additionally, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A boasts a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, indicating its relatively low power consumption. The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G, on the other hand, features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances the processor's AI capabilities.
In conclusion, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G processors offer 8 cores for multitasking capabilities, the Tanggula T740 5G stands out with its newer Cortex-A75 architecture, ARMv8.2-A instruction set, 12 nm lithography, and the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit for enhanced AI performance.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A features 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G consists of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It is interesting to note that the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G employs the more advanced and newer Cortex-A75 architecture.
Both processors share similar core counts, with 8 cores each. This means that both processors are capable of handling multiple tasks simultaneously, allowing for smoother multitasking experiences.
When it comes to instruction set, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A adopts the ARMv8-A instruction set, while the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G utilizes the more recent ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The inclusion of the ARMv8.2-A instruction set in the Tanggula T740 5G may contribute to improved performance and efficiency.
In terms of lithography, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A is manufactured using a 14 nm process, whereas the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G adopts a more advanced 12 nm lithography. The smaller lithography in the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G can potentially lead to better power efficiency and thermal performance.
Additionally, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A boasts a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, indicating its relatively low power consumption. The Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G, on the other hand, features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances the processor's AI capabilities.
In conclusion, while both the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G processors offer 8 cores for multitasking capabilities, the Tanggula T740 5G stands out with its newer Cortex-A75 architecture, ARMv8.2-A instruction set, 12 nm lithography, and the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit for enhanced AI performance.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | PowerVR Rogue |
GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 64 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2960x1440@60Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.75 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2020 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T740, Tiger T7510 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
3
Samsung Exynos 1580 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs MediaTek Helio G70
6
Apple A18 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
7
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
8
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
9
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
10
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs MediaTek Helio A22