HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Unisoc SC9863A
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc SC9863A are two processors that are commonly used in smartphones and other mobile devices. While they have similarities in terms of the number of cores and architecture, there are some key differences in their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710A, it features an architecture of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores allows for a balanced and efficient performance. The processor is built on a 14 nm lithography, which indicates that it is relatively power-efficient, and it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts. With a total of 8 cores and an ARMv8-A instruction set, the Kirin 710A can efficiently handle a wide range of tasks.
In comparison, the Unisoc SC9863A has an architecture of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor also features 8 cores, but with a focus on power efficiency rather than high performance. The SC9863A is built on a 28 nm lithography, which indicates that it may consume more power compared to the Kirin 710A. It has a TDP of 3 Watts. Additionally, the SC9863A also has a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI capabilities in the device it is integrated into.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc SC9863A have some similarities in terms of their 8-core architecture, but they differ in their clock speeds and lithography. The Kirin 710A offers a higher clock speed and a more power-efficient 14 nm lithography, which may result in better overall performance and energy efficiency. On the other hand, the SC9863A prioritizes power efficiency and features an NPU for improved AI capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device they will be used in.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710A, it features an architecture of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores allows for a balanced and efficient performance. The processor is built on a 14 nm lithography, which indicates that it is relatively power-efficient, and it has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts. With a total of 8 cores and an ARMv8-A instruction set, the Kirin 710A can efficiently handle a wide range of tasks.
In comparison, the Unisoc SC9863A has an architecture of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor also features 8 cores, but with a focus on power efficiency rather than high performance. The SC9863A is built on a 28 nm lithography, which indicates that it may consume more power compared to the Kirin 710A. It has a TDP of 3 Watts. Additionally, the SC9863A also has a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances AI capabilities in the device it is integrated into.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Unisoc SC9863A have some similarities in terms of their 8-core architecture, but they differ in their clock speeds and lithography. The Kirin 710A offers a higher clock speed and a more power-efficient 14 nm lithography, which may result in better overall performance and energy efficiency. On the other hand, the SC9863A prioritizes power efficiency and features an NPU for improved AI capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device they will be used in.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 550 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 128 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2018 November |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | SC9863A |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Helio G95
2
Apple A15 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
3
Apple A14 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs MediaTek Helio G90
5
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Helio P65
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs MediaTek Helio G70
7
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
9
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720