HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Unisoc SC7731E
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the Unisoc SC7731E are two processors that cater to different needs and have distinct specifications.
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A boasts a superior architecture, with four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. This combination of cores ensures smooth multitasking and efficient performance across a range of applications. With its ARMv8-A instruction set and 14 nm lithography, this processor delivers power-efficient performance while still maintaining high processing capabilities. It contains 5500 million transistors, indicating its ability to handle complex computations and data processing tasks. With a TDP of 5 watts, this processor strikes a balance between performance and power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E is a more budget-oriented processor. It features four Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz, providing decent performance for day-to-day tasks, but may struggle with resource-intensive applications and multitasking. It operates on the older ARMv7-A instruction set and has a larger 28 nm lithography, which may result in higher power consumption and slightly lower performance compared to the Kirin 710A. With a TDP of 7 watts, it consumes more power than the Kirin 710A, potentially affecting battery life in devices that use this processor.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A offers a more powerful and efficient performance with its superior architecture, smaller lithography, and higher transistor count. It is suitable for users who require high-performance computing and multitasking capabilities. Alternatively, the Unisoc SC7731E appeals to individuals on a budget who prioritize cost-effectiveness over performance. While it may not match the Kirin 710A in terms of power and efficiency, it still delivers satisfactory performance for regular tasks.
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A boasts a superior architecture, with four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. This combination of cores ensures smooth multitasking and efficient performance across a range of applications. With its ARMv8-A instruction set and 14 nm lithography, this processor delivers power-efficient performance while still maintaining high processing capabilities. It contains 5500 million transistors, indicating its ability to handle complex computations and data processing tasks. With a TDP of 5 watts, this processor strikes a balance between performance and power consumption.
On the other hand, the Unisoc SC7731E is a more budget-oriented processor. It features four Cortex-A7 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz, providing decent performance for day-to-day tasks, but may struggle with resource-intensive applications and multitasking. It operates on the older ARMv7-A instruction set and has a larger 28 nm lithography, which may result in higher power consumption and slightly lower performance compared to the Kirin 710A. With a TDP of 7 watts, it consumes more power than the Kirin 710A, potentially affecting battery life in devices that use this processor.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A offers a more powerful and efficient performance with its superior architecture, smaller lithography, and higher transistor count. It is suitable for users who require high-performance computing and multitasking capabilities. Alternatively, the Unisoc SC7731E appeals to individuals on a budget who prioritize cost-effectiveness over performance. While it may not match the Kirin 710A in terms of power and efficiency, it still delivers satisfactory performance for regular tasks.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv7-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 1 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 533 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 600 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | HD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2018 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
3
Apple A10 Fusion vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
7
MediaTek Helio G80 vs Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G
8
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
9
MediaTek Helio P95 vs Apple A10X Fusion
10
MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Helio A25