HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors with their own unique specifications. Let's compare them side by side.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710A features four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 has two Cortex-A78 cores running at 2.5 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. Both processors have 8 cores in total, but the Dimensity 920 uses more advanced cores, which could potentially result in better performance and efficiency.
When it comes to the lithography process, the Kirin 710A is built on a 14 nm process, while the Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced 6 nm process. The smaller the lithography, the more transistors can be packed onto the chip, which often leads to improved power efficiency and heat management. Speaking of transistors, the Kirin 710A has approximately 5,500 million transistors, while the Dimensity 920's transistor count is not specified.
In terms of the instruction set, the Kirin 710A adopts ARMv8-A, which is a widely used and capable instruction set architecture. The Dimensity 920, on the other hand, uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which could potentially offer improved performance and new features compared to the Kirin 710A.
Power consumption is another important factor to consider. The Kirin 710A has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, which indicates relatively low power consumption. In contrast, the Dimensity 920 has a TDP of 10 Watts, suggesting it consumes more power. However, it's important to note that power consumption can vary depending on various factors, including workload and device optimization.
Lastly, the Dimensity 920 features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is designed to accelerate machine learning tasks. Unfortunately, the Kirin 710A does not mention support for an NPU.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 outshines the HiSilicon Kirin 710A in several areas. It boasts a more advanced lithography process, potentially more powerful CPU cores, and supports the updated ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Kirin 710A excels in terms of power efficiency, carrying a lower TDP. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710A features four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 has two Cortex-A78 cores running at 2.5 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. Both processors have 8 cores in total, but the Dimensity 920 uses more advanced cores, which could potentially result in better performance and efficiency.
When it comes to the lithography process, the Kirin 710A is built on a 14 nm process, while the Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced 6 nm process. The smaller the lithography, the more transistors can be packed onto the chip, which often leads to improved power efficiency and heat management. Speaking of transistors, the Kirin 710A has approximately 5,500 million transistors, while the Dimensity 920's transistor count is not specified.
In terms of the instruction set, the Kirin 710A adopts ARMv8-A, which is a widely used and capable instruction set architecture. The Dimensity 920, on the other hand, uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which could potentially offer improved performance and new features compared to the Kirin 710A.
Power consumption is another important factor to consider. The Kirin 710A has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, which indicates relatively low power consumption. In contrast, the Dimensity 920 has a TDP of 10 Watts, suggesting it consumes more power. However, it's important to note that power consumption can vary depending on various factors, including workload and device optimization.
Lastly, the Dimensity 920 features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is designed to accelerate machine learning tasks. Unfortunately, the Kirin 710A does not mention support for an NPU.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 outshines the HiSilicon Kirin 710A in several areas. It boasts a more advanced lithography process, potentially more powerful CPU cores, and supports the updated ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Kirin 710A excels in terms of power efficiency, carrying a lower TDP. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 950 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | MT6877T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
2
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs MediaTek Helio P70
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs MediaTek Helio G85
5
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
6
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 9825
7
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
8
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
9
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
10
Apple A16 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821