HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors with their own unique specifications. Let's compare them side by side.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710A features four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 has two Cortex-A78 cores running at 2.5 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. Both processors have 8 cores in total, but the Dimensity 920 uses more advanced cores, which could potentially result in better performance and efficiency.
When it comes to the lithography process, the Kirin 710A is built on a 14 nm process, while the Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced 6 nm process. The smaller the lithography, the more transistors can be packed onto the chip, which often leads to improved power efficiency and heat management. Speaking of transistors, the Kirin 710A has approximately 5,500 million transistors, while the Dimensity 920's transistor count is not specified.
In terms of the instruction set, the Kirin 710A adopts ARMv8-A, which is a widely used and capable instruction set architecture. The Dimensity 920, on the other hand, uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which could potentially offer improved performance and new features compared to the Kirin 710A.
Power consumption is another important factor to consider. The Kirin 710A has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, which indicates relatively low power consumption. In contrast, the Dimensity 920 has a TDP of 10 Watts, suggesting it consumes more power. However, it's important to note that power consumption can vary depending on various factors, including workload and device optimization.
Lastly, the Dimensity 920 features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is designed to accelerate machine learning tasks. Unfortunately, the Kirin 710A does not mention support for an NPU.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 outshines the HiSilicon Kirin 710A in several areas. It boasts a more advanced lithography process, potentially more powerful CPU cores, and supports the updated ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Kirin 710A excels in terms of power efficiency, carrying a lower TDP. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710A features four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 has two Cortex-A78 cores running at 2.5 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. Both processors have 8 cores in total, but the Dimensity 920 uses more advanced cores, which could potentially result in better performance and efficiency.
When it comes to the lithography process, the Kirin 710A is built on a 14 nm process, while the Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced 6 nm process. The smaller the lithography, the more transistors can be packed onto the chip, which often leads to improved power efficiency and heat management. Speaking of transistors, the Kirin 710A has approximately 5,500 million transistors, while the Dimensity 920's transistor count is not specified.
In terms of the instruction set, the Kirin 710A adopts ARMv8-A, which is a widely used and capable instruction set architecture. The Dimensity 920, on the other hand, uses the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, which could potentially offer improved performance and new features compared to the Kirin 710A.
Power consumption is another important factor to consider. The Kirin 710A has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 5 Watts, which indicates relatively low power consumption. In contrast, the Dimensity 920 has a TDP of 10 Watts, suggesting it consumes more power. However, it's important to note that power consumption can vary depending on various factors, including workload and device optimization.
Lastly, the Dimensity 920 features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is designed to accelerate machine learning tasks. Unfortunately, the Kirin 710A does not mention support for an NPU.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 outshines the HiSilicon Kirin 710A in several areas. It boasts a more advanced lithography process, potentially more powerful CPU cores, and supports the updated ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Kirin 710A excels in terms of power efficiency, carrying a lower TDP. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 950 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | MT6877T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A10 Fusion vs MediaTek Helio A25
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
5
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
6
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9610
7
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T710
8
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G