HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two processors that cater to different segments of the market. Let's compare their specifications to see how they differ.
In terms of architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A boasts 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 takes it up a notch with 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 820 has slightly faster and more efficient cores compared to the Kirin 710A.
Both processors have 8 cores, ensuring smooth multitasking and efficient performance. However, the Dimensity 820 comes with an additional feature - its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This NPU allows for enhanced AI performance, enabling features like smart photography and efficient power management.
Moving on to the lithography, the Kirin 710A is based on a 14 nm process while the Dimensity 820 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Dimensity 820 indicates better power efficiency and potentially superior overall performance.
When it comes to power consumption, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A has a TDP of 5 watts, while the MediaTek Dimensity 820 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 watts. This suggests that the Kirin 710A is more power-efficient than the Dimensity 820, which could be a crucial factor for some users.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 outshines the HiSilicon Kirin 710A in terms of CPU cores, architecture, lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. However, the Kirin 710A has a lower TDP, indicating superior power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on specific user requirements and priorities, such as AI capabilities, power consumption, and overall performance.
In terms of architecture, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A boasts 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 takes it up a notch with 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This indicates that the Dimensity 820 has slightly faster and more efficient cores compared to the Kirin 710A.
Both processors have 8 cores, ensuring smooth multitasking and efficient performance. However, the Dimensity 820 comes with an additional feature - its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This NPU allows for enhanced AI performance, enabling features like smart photography and efficient power management.
Moving on to the lithography, the Kirin 710A is based on a 14 nm process while the Dimensity 820 utilizes a more advanced 7 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Dimensity 820 indicates better power efficiency and potentially superior overall performance.
When it comes to power consumption, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A has a TDP of 5 watts, while the MediaTek Dimensity 820 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 watts. This suggests that the Kirin 710A is more power-efficient than the Dimensity 820, which could be a crucial factor for some users.
In conclusion, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 outshines the HiSilicon Kirin 710A in terms of CPU cores, architecture, lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU. However, the Kirin 710A has a lower TDP, indicating superior power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on specific user requirements and priorities, such as AI capabilities, power consumption, and overall performance.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP5 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 5 |
Shaders | 64 | 80 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2020 May |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | MT6875 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
2
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs MediaTek Helio P70
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Samsung Exynos 990
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs MediaTek Helio G35
5
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
6
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
7
Apple A12 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio P35
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
9
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MediaTek Helio P95
10
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665