HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the MediaTek Dimensity 810 are both processors commonly used in smartphones and other devices. These processors have different specifications that set them apart from each other.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710A, this processor utilizes an 8-core architecture. It consists of 4 Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. The 14 nm lithography and 5500 million transistors contribute to its power efficiency. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, it is a low-power processor suitable for devices with limited battery capacity.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 is also an 8-core processor but with a different core configuration. It features 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz, providing a balance between performance and power consumption. The Dimensity 810 utilizes a more advanced 6 nm lithography and boasts 12000 million transistors, indicating improved power efficiency and processing capabilities. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI processing.
Comparing the two processors, the key differences are in their core architecture, lithography, and transistor count. The Kirin 710A uses a combination of Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores, while the Dimensity 810 employs Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. The Dimensity 810 also benefits from a more efficient 6 nm lithography compared to the 14 nm of the Kirin 710A, resulting in improved power efficiency and potentially better performance. Moreover, the Dimensity 810's higher transistor count suggests it may be capable of handling more intensive tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific requirements of the device and the desired balance between performance and power consumption. The Kirin 710A could be a suitable option for devices with limited power resources, while the Dimensity 810 may offer better performance and AI capabilities with its more advanced specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710A, this processor utilizes an 8-core architecture. It consists of 4 Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. The 14 nm lithography and 5500 million transistors contribute to its power efficiency. With a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, it is a low-power processor suitable for devices with limited battery capacity.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 is also an 8-core processor but with a different core configuration. It features 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz, providing a balance between performance and power consumption. The Dimensity 810 utilizes a more advanced 6 nm lithography and boasts 12000 million transistors, indicating improved power efficiency and processing capabilities. Additionally, it includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI processing.
Comparing the two processors, the key differences are in their core architecture, lithography, and transistor count. The Kirin 710A uses a combination of Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores, while the Dimensity 810 employs Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. The Dimensity 810 also benefits from a more efficient 6 nm lithography compared to the 14 nm of the Kirin 710A, resulting in improved power efficiency and potentially better performance. Moreover, the Dimensity 810's higher transistor count suggests it may be capable of handling more intensive tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between these two processors will depend on the specific requirements of the device and the desired balance between performance and power consumption. The Kirin 710A could be a suitable option for devices with limited power resources, while the Dimensity 810 may offer better performance and AI capabilities with its more advanced specifications.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | 12000 million |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 8 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 2 |
| Shaders | 64 | 32 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 2K@30FPS |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 7030 vs Unisoc T820
2
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9500s vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
5
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Samsung Exynos 7870
6
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Apple A19
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 4
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Samsung Exynos 9611
10
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Samsung Exynos 7904