HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and MediaTek Dimensity 800U are both processors designed for mobile devices. Let's compare their specifications to see how they differ.
In terms of CPU architecture, the Kirin 710A features 8 cores with a combination of 4 Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 800U also has 8 cores but with a different configuration. It consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz.
Moving on to other specifications, the Kirin 710A has a lithography of 14 nm, meaning it is manufactured using a 14 nanometer process. It has around 5500 million transistors and a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts. As for the Dimensity 800U, it utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography, allowing for better power efficiency and potentially improved performance. It also incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which can significantly enhance AI-related tasks.
Though both processors possess 8 cores, the different configurations and clock speeds can result in variations in performance. The Kirin 710A may offer better performance for tasks that benefit from higher single-threaded performance, while the Dimensity 800U may excel in multitasking or workloads that favor multi-threaded performance.
Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements of the device and the intended usage. The Kirin 710A could be a suitable option for devices that prioritize power efficiency, while the Dimensity 800U's superior lithography and inclusion of an NPU might make it a better choice for cutting-edge AI applications or demanding tasks.
In terms of CPU architecture, the Kirin 710A features 8 cores with a combination of 4 Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 4 Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 800U also has 8 cores but with a different configuration. It consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz.
Moving on to other specifications, the Kirin 710A has a lithography of 14 nm, meaning it is manufactured using a 14 nanometer process. It has around 5500 million transistors and a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts. As for the Dimensity 800U, it utilizes a more advanced 7 nm lithography, allowing for better power efficiency and potentially improved performance. It also incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which can significantly enhance AI-related tasks.
Though both processors possess 8 cores, the different configurations and clock speeds can result in variations in performance. The Kirin 710A may offer better performance for tasks that benefit from higher single-threaded performance, while the Dimensity 800U may excel in multitasking or workloads that favor multi-threaded performance.
Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements of the device and the intended usage. The Kirin 710A could be a suitable option for devices that prioritize power efficiency, while the Dimensity 800U's superior lithography and inclusion of an NPU might make it a better choice for cutting-edge AI applications or demanding tasks.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 12 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP3 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 3 |
Shaders | 64 | 48 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30FPS |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2020 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Samsung Exynos 990
2
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Apple A11 Bionic
5
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
6
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
7
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
8
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs MediaTek Helio G37
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Apple A15 Bionic
10
MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Helio G36