HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and HiSilicon Kirin 960 are both processors that power smartphones and other electronic devices. Despite their similar names, there are significant differences in their specifications and performance.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have 8 cores. The Kirin 710A uses a combination of four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. On the other hand, the Kirin 960 features four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This indicates that the Kirin 960 has a higher clock speed, which can translate to faster processing and improved overall performance.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 710A is manufactured using a 14 nm process, while the Kirin 960 has a 16 nm process. A smaller lithography often results in better power efficiency and improved thermal performance, allowing for longer battery life and less heat generation.
The number of transistors in a processor is an important factor in determining its complexity and performance. The Kirin 710A has 5500 million transistors, whereas the Kirin 960 has 4000 million transistors. This implies that the Kirin 710A is more advanced and capable of handling more complex tasks.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, indicating that they operate efficiently with low power consumption. This can result in longer battery life and reduced heat generation.
In summary, while both the Kirin 710A and Kirin 960 processors have similar numbers of cores, instruction sets, and TDPs, they differ in clock speed, lithography, and number of transistors. The Kirin 960 offers a higher clock speed and a smaller lithography, potentially leading to better performance and power efficiency. However, the Kirin 710A has a higher number of transistors, indicating advanced capabilities. The choice between the two processors ultimately depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the device being powered.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have 8 cores. The Kirin 710A uses a combination of four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.7 GHz. On the other hand, the Kirin 960 features four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This indicates that the Kirin 960 has a higher clock speed, which can translate to faster processing and improved overall performance.
In terms of lithography, the Kirin 710A is manufactured using a 14 nm process, while the Kirin 960 has a 16 nm process. A smaller lithography often results in better power efficiency and improved thermal performance, allowing for longer battery life and less heat generation.
The number of transistors in a processor is an important factor in determining its complexity and performance. The Kirin 710A has 5500 million transistors, whereas the Kirin 960 has 4000 million transistors. This implies that the Kirin 710A is more advanced and capable of handling more complex tasks.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, indicating that they operate efficiently with low power consumption. This can result in longer battery life and reduced heat generation.
In summary, while both the Kirin 710A and Kirin 960 processors have similar numbers of cores, instruction sets, and TDPs, they differ in clock speed, lithography, and number of transistors. The Kirin 960 offers a higher clock speed and a smaller lithography, potentially leading to better performance and power efficiency. However, the Kirin 710A has a higher number of transistors, indicating advanced capabilities. The choice between the two processors ultimately depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the device being powered.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | 4000 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G71 MP8 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 900 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 8 |
Shaders | 64 | 128 |
DirectX | 12 | 11.3 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 20MP, 2x 12MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2016 October |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | Hi3660 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
2
Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
3
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
4
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
5
Apple A13 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
6
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9610
7
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
9
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
10
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200