HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
When comparing the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the HiSilicon Kirin 955 processors, several differences can be observed in their specifications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710A has a combination of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Kirin 955 features 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores.
In terms of the number of cores, both processors have 8 cores, providing a balanced performance. Additionally, they both utilize the ARMv8-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software.
Another important aspect to consider is the lithography, which affects the size and power efficiency of the processors. The Kirin 710A has a smaller lithography of 14 nm compared to the Kirin 955's 16 nm. This indicates that the Kirin 710A may consume less power and potentially offer better efficiency, providing longer battery life for devices.
Moreover, the number of transistors is significantly higher in the Kirin 710A, with 5500 million transistors compared to the Kirin 955's 2000 million. This suggests that the Kirin 710A may have better overall performance and improved capabilities in handling complex tasks.
Lastly, both processors have the same thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, ensuring that they generate a similar amount of heat during operation.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the HiSilicon Kirin 955 processors have distinct differences in their specifications. The Kirin 710A offers a smaller lithography, higher number of transistors, and different CPU core architecture compared to the Kirin 955. However, the TDP and number of cores remain consistent between the two processors. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710A has a combination of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Kirin 955 features 4x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A72 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores.
In terms of the number of cores, both processors have 8 cores, providing a balanced performance. Additionally, they both utilize the ARMv8-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software.
Another important aspect to consider is the lithography, which affects the size and power efficiency of the processors. The Kirin 710A has a smaller lithography of 14 nm compared to the Kirin 955's 16 nm. This indicates that the Kirin 710A may consume less power and potentially offer better efficiency, providing longer battery life for devices.
Moreover, the number of transistors is significantly higher in the Kirin 710A, with 5500 million transistors compared to the Kirin 955's 2000 million. This suggests that the Kirin 710A may have better overall performance and improved capabilities in handling complex tasks.
Lastly, both processors have the same thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts, ensuring that they generate a similar amount of heat during operation.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the HiSilicon Kirin 955 processors have distinct differences in their specifications. The Kirin 710A offers a smaller lithography, higher number of transistors, and different CPU core architecture compared to the Kirin 955. However, the TDP and number of cores remain consistent between the two processors. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A72 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | 2000 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.0 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-T880 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 900 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 64 |
DirectX | 12 | 11.2 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 31MP, 2x 13MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2016 April |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | Hi3655 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A17 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Google Tensor G1
3
MediaTek Helio G95 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
4
Samsung Exynos 850 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Apple A16 Bionic
6
Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821
7
MediaTek Helio G85 vs MediaTek Helio G88
8
Samsung Exynos 990 vs MediaTek Helio P65
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Apple A15 Bionic
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845