HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
When comparing the specifications of the HiSilicon Kirin 710A and the HiSilicon Kirin 930 processors, several differences can be observed.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710A features 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Kirin 930 has 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Kirin 710A has slightly faster Cortex-A73 cores compared to the Kirin 930's Cortex-A53 cores.
Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, there is a notable difference in the lithography between the two. The Kirin 710A is built on a more advanced 14 nm lithography, while the Kirin 930 uses a 28 nm lithography. This means that the Kirin 710A is potentially more power-efficient and can offer better performance due to the smaller transistor size.
Speaking of transistors, the Kirin 710A has around 5500 million transistors, while the Kirin 930 has approximately 1000 million transistors. This again highlights the Kirin 710A's more advanced technology, which allows for a higher density of transistors, potentially leading to improved performance.
In terms of power consumption, both processors have a TDP (thermal design power) of 5 Watts. This suggests that they have similar power efficiency and are designed to operate in a similar power envelope.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A outperforms the HiSilicon Kirin 930 in several areas, including CPU architecture, lithography, and transistor count. These improvements imply that the Kirin 710A is likely to provide better performance and power efficiency compared to the older Kirin 930.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710A features 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the Kirin 930 has 4x 2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The Kirin 710A has slightly faster Cortex-A73 cores compared to the Kirin 930's Cortex-A53 cores.
Both processors have 8 cores and support the ARMv8-A instruction set. However, there is a notable difference in the lithography between the two. The Kirin 710A is built on a more advanced 14 nm lithography, while the Kirin 930 uses a 28 nm lithography. This means that the Kirin 710A is potentially more power-efficient and can offer better performance due to the smaller transistor size.
Speaking of transistors, the Kirin 710A has around 5500 million transistors, while the Kirin 930 has approximately 1000 million transistors. This again highlights the Kirin 710A's more advanced technology, which allows for a higher density of transistors, potentially leading to improved performance.
In terms of power consumption, both processors have a TDP (thermal design power) of 5 Watts. This suggests that they have similar power efficiency and are designed to operate in a similar power envelope.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 710A outperforms the HiSilicon Kirin 930 in several areas, including CPU architecture, lithography, and transistor count. These improvements imply that the Kirin 710A is likely to provide better performance and power efficiency compared to the older Kirin 930.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | 1000 million |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR3 |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-T628 MP4 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Midgard |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 4 |
| Shaders | 64 | 64 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2560x1600 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 20MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2015 Quarter 2 |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | Hi3630 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Helio G88
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
4
Samsung Exynos 980 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
5
Samsung Exynos 7885 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
6
MediaTek Helio G25 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
7
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
8
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Apple M3 (iPad)
9
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Helio P60
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G