HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 710A and Kirin 9000 5G are two processors that belong to the same brand. However, they possess different specifications that set them apart from each other.
Starting with the Kirin 710A, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a powerful processing performance. The Kirin 710A operates on ARMv8-A instruction set and has a fabrication lithography of 14 nm. It houses 5500 million transistors and requires a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watt.
On the other hand, the Kirin 9000 5G boasts a more advanced architecture. It combines 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 710A, it also has 8 cores; however, the Kirin 9000 5G operates on ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing an enhanced performance. It utilizes a 5 nm lithography, resulting in greater energy efficiency. With an impressive 15300 million transistors, this processor offers a substantial increase in processing power. The TDP for the Kirin 9000 5G is slightly higher at 6 Watt. Additionally, it incorporates Neural Processing with Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x) as well as HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, contributing to its AI capabilities.
Comparing the two processors, it is evident that the Kirin 9000 5G outshines the Kirin 710A in terms of specifications. It features a more advanced architecture, a smaller fabrication lithography, and a higher number of transistors, indicating improved performance and energy efficiency. Additionally, the inclusion of advanced AI capabilities further enhances its overall processing capabilities.
In conclusion, while the Kirin 710A remains a capable processor, the Kirin 9000 5G stands as the superior choice due to its more advanced specifications and enhanced features.
Starting with the Kirin 710A, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a powerful processing performance. The Kirin 710A operates on ARMv8-A instruction set and has a fabrication lithography of 14 nm. It houses 5500 million transistors and requires a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watt.
On the other hand, the Kirin 9000 5G boasts a more advanced architecture. It combines 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Kirin 710A, it also has 8 cores; however, the Kirin 9000 5G operates on ARMv8.2-A instruction set, providing an enhanced performance. It utilizes a 5 nm lithography, resulting in greater energy efficiency. With an impressive 15300 million transistors, this processor offers a substantial increase in processing power. The TDP for the Kirin 9000 5G is slightly higher at 6 Watt. Additionally, it incorporates Neural Processing with Ascend Lite (2x) and Ascend Tiny (1x) as well as HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0, contributing to its AI capabilities.
Comparing the two processors, it is evident that the Kirin 9000 5G outshines the Kirin 710A in terms of specifications. It features a more advanced architecture, a smaller fabrication lithography, and a higher number of transistors, indicating improved performance and energy efficiency. Additionally, the inclusion of advanced AI capabilities further enhances its overall processing capabilities.
In conclusion, while the Kirin 710A remains a capable processor, the Kirin 9000 5G stands as the superior choice due to its more advanced specifications and enhanced features.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | 15300 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite (2x) + Ascend Tiny (1x), HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2750 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G78 MP24 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 760 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 24 |
Shaders | 64 | 384 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 24MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 4.6 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 2.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 4 | 2020 October |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P90 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
2
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
3
Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Unisoc SC9863A
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Helio G25
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Unisoc SC9832E
7
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
8
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
9
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
10
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs MediaTek Helio P65