Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung Exynos 2600

VS

Which processor is better? We compared Google Tensor G3 with Samsung Exynos 2600. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

AnTuTu 10

Total Score

Tensor G3

1098827

Exynos 2600

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score

Tensor G3

1758

Exynos 2600

3455

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score

Tensor G3

4461

Exynos 2600

11621

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture	1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3 4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510	1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro 6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro
Number of cores	9	10
Instruction Set	ARMv9-A	ARMv9.3-A
Lithography	4 nm	2 nm
TDP	6 Watt
Neural Processing	Google Tensor AI	AI engine with 32K MAC NPU

Memory (RAM)

Max amount	up to 16 GB	up to 24 GB
Memory type	LPDDR5X	LPDDR5X
Memory-bus	4x16 bit	4x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification

UFS 4.0

Graphics

GPU name	Mali-G715 MP10	Xclipse 960
GPU Architecture		RDNA
GPU frequency	890 MHz	985 MHz
Execution units	10
Shaders	176
DirectX		12.1
OpenCL API	3.0	2.0
OpenGL API	ES 3.2
Vulkan API	1.3	1.4

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution	3840x2160	3840x2160
Max camera resolution	1x 200MP, 2x 32MP	1x 320MP
Max Video Capture	8K@30fps	8K@30fps
Video codec support	AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9	AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9

Wireless

4G network	Yes	Yes
5G network	Yes	Yes
Peak Download Speed	7.3 Gbps	14.79 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed	3.7 Gbps
Wi-Fi	7 (802.11be)	7 (802.11be)
Bluetooth	5.3	6.0
Satellite navigation	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS